Software engineering (SE) job interviews stand out for their rigorous and often grueling nature, unlike many other professions. These interviews typically consist of multiple rounds, ranging from 7 to 12, with a significant portion dedicated to practical coding exercises. Candidates are required to showcase their coding abilities on the spot to a panel of evaluators, many of whom may lack expertise in the field.
The intensity of SE interviews raises questions about why such demands are placed on SEs compared to other professions. SEs are expected to possess a deep and up-to-date knowledge of various software platforms, regardless of their age or novelty. This expectation parallels the fictional character Neo from “The Matrix,” illustrating the unrealistic standards imposed on SEs.
Comparisons to other professions highlight the unique challenges faced by SEs during interviews. Lawyers aren’t asked to conduct a trial, doctors aren’t expected to perform ER procedures, and mechanics aren’t required to rebuild engines on the spot. Yet, SEs are subjected to intense coding tasks to prove their capabilities, despite their resumes already showcasing their qualifications.
Critics argue that excessive rounds of interviews overlook the essence of evaluating candidates’ ability to learn and adapt to a company’s specific processes. Rather than subjecting candidates to endless rounds of scrutiny, some suggest that employers should focus on recognizing candidates’ readiness and willingness to excel in the role, streamlining the hiring process and alleviating the burden on candidates in a competitive job market.